<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Integraph Blog</title><description>Notes on structural analysis, design standards, and how the Coriolis tools compute what they compute.</description><link>https://integraph.com.au/</link><language>en-au</language><item><title>One sign convention, across every tool</title><link>https://integraph.com.au/blog/one-sign-convention-across-every-tool/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://integraph.com.au/blog/one-sign-convention-across-every-tool/</guid><description>Sign errors do not crash anything. They produce a plausible number with the wrong sense, and they survive review. So we fixed the convention once, platform-wide.</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>standards</category><category>product</category></item><item><title>Exact section properties for curved geometry</title><link>https://integraph.com.au/blog/exact-section-properties-for-curved-geometry/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://integraph.com.au/blog/exact-section-properties-for-curved-geometry/</guid><description>Most section tools approximate an arc with a polygon and quietly inherit the error. GCS integrates the arc, and reserves faceting for the places that genuinely need it.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>section-properties</category></item><item><title>Why we would rather show you an error than a number</title><link>https://integraph.com.au/blog/why-we-would-rather-show-you-an-error/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://integraph.com.au/blog/why-we-would-rather-show-you-an-error/</guid><description>Structural software is judged on the numbers it prints. We think it should be judged on the numbers it refuses to print.</description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>product</category></item></channel></rss>